Archive for August, 2008

Can I have my Windows Mobile device wipe its memory after failed logons

stolenphone Can I have my Windows Mobile device wipe its memory after failed logonsDid you know you can wipe a lost or stolen Windows Mobile device if you configure it before hand? As an Administrator using Microsoft Exchange Server 2003 (SP2), you now have tools with which to set and enforce your mobile device security policies. You can also control some of the features on the mobile devices by using provisioning tools. Check this out:

Excessive failed logon attempts may signal that a wireless device has been lost or stolen — a serious security risk. Find out how to configure your Windows Mobile 5 and 6 devices for local wiping, so they automatically destroy their data after a specified number of failed logons.

Most security policies for Windows Mobile devices are what I call “scorched-earth” policies. Essentially, an Exchange administrator remote wipes a mobile device to mitigate a specific security risk, such as a lost or stolen device. All Exchange Server data is completely erased when a wireless device is “wiped clean.”

You can trigger a remote wipe of a mobile device through Exchange Server 2007 and Outlook Web Access (OWA) 2007, but that presumes the wireless device will contact the Exchange server at some point.

remotewipe1 Can I have my Windows Mobile device wipe its memory after failed logons

It makes sense to allow mobile devices to wipe themselves when certain prerequisite conditions are met, such as a specified number of failed personal identification number (PIN) entries or incorrect password attempts. This mobile security feature is called a local wipe.

Windows Mobile 5 and 6 devices have provisions for performing local wipes. However, this setting is not enabled by default, and for good reason. Discovering that your Windows Mobile device has committed digital suicide after you messed up your fifth attempt to punch in your PIN can be aggravating — especially if you didn’t know such a policy was in place to begin with.

But if your organization wants to implement this additional layer of security around Windows Mobile devices, it can be done — with a little work.

* First, the Password Required Policy (security policy ID 4131), a Windows Mobile security policy setting, must be enabled for the device in question.

* Next, a registry entry has to be set on the mobile device to enable this feature. In HKLM\Comm\Security\Policy\LASSD, create the decimal key DeviceWipeThreshold and set it to any positive number. This number will be the number of incorrect password logon attempts to allow before the device’s memory is wiped. This setting is also available in the Device Security Settings dialog box in the Exchange Management Console.


 

NOTE: In Windows Mobile 4, this function did not erase any external memory on the device, such as an SD card or other plug-in memory device. However, Windows Mobile 6 devices will erase external memory cards as well.

remotewipe2 300x117 Can I have my Windows Mobile device wipe its memory after failed logons

About the author: Serdar Yegulalp is editor of Windows Insight, a newsletter devoted to hints, tips, tricks, news and goodies for all flavors of Windows users.

[Via TechTargetl]

Admin’s Arsenal: KeePass v1.x

Someone asked me today what tool I would say helps me most in my day to day job duties. Man was that a tough question to answer! I have about 30-40 tools that I use on a daily (or at least every other day) basis, so to pick one is like having to choose what finger you like best (no snickering back there).

I guess what it all comes down to is what tool I use most. Hands down that tool is KeePass Password Safe.

It’s hard to cover everything that KeePass does, but this quote from the official site does a better job than I can:

KeePass is a free/open-source password manager or safe which helps you to manage your passwords in a secure way. You can put all your passwords in one database, which is locked with one master key or a key file. So you only have to remember one single master password or select the key file to unlock the whole database. The databases are encrypted using the best and most secure encryption algorithms currently known (AES and Twofish).

I use KeePass more than any other tool in my Arsenal simply because I have so many passwords to remember.

One of the features that makes KeePass better than other password managers is that you can attach files to entries, which are then encrypted with the KeePass Database. I personally use this to keep all of our VPN keys handy so that when a user complains that they are having problems with their VPN, I can log in as them and see if it is in fact an issue with their VPN tunnel or just user error.

My absolute favorite feature though is its portabliity. Here is a short list of all the different platforms that KeePass works on:

  • Windows
  • Linux
  • Mac OSX
  • BlackBerry (huge score here as I love being able to access all my passwords from my phone)
  • PocketPC and Smart Devices (including Windows Mobile 6.0)
  • Symbian
  • PalmOS
  • USB drives (specifically portableapps.com)
  • USB drives (U3 platform)
  • PE environments (WinPE and BARTPE)

Pretty much anywhere you are likely to need it from. I specifically call out the 1.x versions as the 2.x ALPHA versions require the DotNET framework, and are not as portable as a side effect. No need to worry though, 1.x is still in active development, and is open source, so even if the current devs stop work on it, development will continue.

KeePass also has quite an extensive plugin library, which further enhances it’s functionality. If you’re looking for a password manager that you can use anywhere, you would be hard pressed to find one better at it than KeePass.

Some information about Windows Server 2008 aka R2 Windows Server 7

This information comes from Mary Jo Foley on ZDNet.

After sending me a note that led me to believe that Microsoft had decided to veer from its original plan of an R2 update followed by a full-fledged Server update, a Microsoft spokeswoman called on August 18 to tell me that her note to me was misleading.

So, scratch that Friday evening post. Microsoft is still doing what it had led folks to believe up until this point: A release called Windows Server 2008 R2 is still on the books (now officially slated for 2010). And there will be some release two years after that which may or may not be called Windows 7 Server. (Microsoft currently won’t say anything about the planned naming for this release.)

And just to keep things extra confusing, the spokeswoman told me that if and when anyone hears references to “Windows 7 Server,” what they really mean is “Windows Server 2008 R2.” In other words, the codename for the Windows Server 2008 R2 release is “Windows 7 Server” — which, based on previous Microsoft naming conventions, should be the codename for the release that comes out after Windows Server 2008 R2…. Yeah….

A comment sent to me by an anonymous reader, good old anonymous@anonymous.com this morning makes more sense now. (Note to reader: Why anonymous? If you don’t want me to use your name in a posting, I won’t.)“Okay, I don’t know how someone on our side could have miscommunicated this or if you are purposely reporting this incorrectly, but let’s be clear on this: Windows 7 Server is and has always been Windows Server 2008 R2.

“Furthermore, Windows 7, despite it’s rather pretentious sounding code name (a result of Sinofsky’s like of big round numbers) is NOT Windows NT 7, but rather 6.1(current builds are numbered 67xx as a direct continuation of the longhorn codebase). Put simply, it is not a big jump as a codebase revision and the new changes, on both the client and server, will be focused on user features, not core OS components. The big core OS changes are WDDM 2 and a kernel scheduler update to remove the simple bitmask enumeration of processors so that the OS can schedule more than 64 concurrent threads.

“Finally, and I can’t be more clear on this, ‘Windows 7? client and Windows Server 2008 R2 will RTM simultaneously (and just so you are 100% clear on this) and are based on exactly the same codebase (just as Vista SP1 and Server 2008 are based on an identical core OS codebase).

“As for the next major release (meaning a full revision of the NT codebase) that will not occur until well after the current Win7 wave.”

[ZDNet Via TwistedEthics - Thanks Phil!]

How can I show FOLDER size in my Windows Explorer?

I find myself right clicking for the properties of a folder to find out how big it is – way too often! So I went-a-looking for a quick and easy solution. Sure enough there is a free app that will modify your Windows Explorer to include a Folder Size Column!

Awesome! All you need to do is go here: http://foldersize.sourceforge.net/

Download, Install and then goto windows explorer right click on any column and choose Folder Size!

I love easy solutions!

_TheMondayHatingAdmiN_

Of licensing agreements and such

Have you ever looked at a software EULA? It’s almost enough to make me want to puke, and I’m quite certain that most of the “clauses” in most of the software EULA’s out there are completely unenforceable (it’s like the people that write these things have never heard of the First Sale Doctrine).

Recently I’ve been forced to deal with Microsoft licensing, as well as licensing for several other major software packages, and I feel like I need to hire a lawyer to ensure that I am not violating the license agreements by looking at the software funny (don’t laugh – it is entirely possible that there is a clause in there somewhere that voids the license if I were to glare at the software).

I’ve had enough. While researching some of this stuff I came across a website that was apparently created by people that also are not too fond of the ridiculous direction that software licensing has taken of late, I give you Reasonable Agreement.

From this I’ve created a new email signature (I absolutely loathe the fact that I have to put a disclaimer on my work email – trust me they are totally and completely unenforceable anyway), for my personal email which reads like this:

Best regards,

Joe Glessner
__________________
READ CAREFULLY. By receiving this email you agree, on behalf of your employer, to release me from all obligations and waivers arising from any and all NON-NEGOTIATED agreements, licenses, terms-of-service, shrinkwrap, clickwrap, browsewrap, confidentiality, non-disclosure, non-compete and acceptable use policies (”BOGUS AGREEMENTS”) that I have entered into with your employer, its partners, licensors, agents and assigns, in perpetuity, without prejudice to my ongoing rights and privileges. You further represent that you have the authority to release me from any BOGUS AGREEMENTS on behalf of your employer.




This site is more than just the anti-EULA, it is a collection of experiences of people dealing with these terrible license agreements in the real world. If you’re looking to waste some time and get a good laugh, there is some pretty funny stuff there.