<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should I try the new FireFox 3 Beta? First impressions&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.asktheadmin.com/2007/11/should-i-try-the-new-firefox-3-beta-first-impressions.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.asktheadmin.com/2007/11/should-i-try-the-new-firefox-3-beta-first-impressions.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 06:08:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugh</title>
		<link>http://www.asktheadmin.com/2007/11/should-i-try-the-new-firefox-3-beta-first-impressions.html/comment-page-1#comment-4502</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2007 10:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ata.inspiritnetworks.com/2007/11/should-i-try-the-new-firefox-3-beta-first-impressions.html#comment-4502</guid>
		<description>Any word yet on removing the cutesy Bookmark and Go buttons?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Reply by email please. TIA. :)&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;hugh AT hughmarshall.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any word yet on removing the cutesy Bookmark and Go buttons?</p>
<p>Reply by email please. TIA. :)</p>
<p>hugh AT hughmarshall.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karl L. Gechlik</title>
		<link>http://www.asktheadmin.com/2007/11/should-i-try-the-new-firefox-3-beta-first-impressions.html/comment-page-1#comment-4495</link>
		<dc:creator>Karl L. Gechlik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 23:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ata.inspiritnetworks.com/2007/11/should-i-try-the-new-firefox-3-beta-first-impressions.html#comment-4495</guid>
		<description>@Jay i am writing this in ff 3. I didnt say I didnt love being the first kid on my block with a new toy! Ill deal with it and keep it running in a vmware session till its stable.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;thanks for reading!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jay i am writing this in ff 3. I didnt say I didnt love being the first kid on my block with a new toy! Ill deal with it and keep it running in a vmware session till its stable.</p>
<p>thanks for reading!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://www.asktheadmin.com/2007/11/should-i-try-the-new-firefox-3-beta-first-impressions.html/comment-page-1#comment-4494</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 23:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ata.inspiritnetworks.com/2007/11/should-i-try-the-new-firefox-3-beta-first-impressions.html#comment-4494</guid>
		<description>More info:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Using the machine above, ff3b is about 20% faster on load times for pages.  I also opened the same set of 4 tabs, in the same order, on each browser, and 2.0.0.9 used 70 megs of memory, and 3b1 used 46 megs.  Not bad!&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;@Karl - I hear ya, and I&#039;ll wait patiently.  I know this sucker can flash fry a buffalo in 40 seconds, but I want it now!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More info:</p>
<p>Using the machine above, ff3b is about 20% faster on load times for pages.  I also opened the same set of 4 tabs, in the same order, on each browser, and 2.0.0.9 used 70 megs of memory, and 3b1 used 46 megs.  Not bad!</p>
<p>@Karl &#8211; I hear ya, and I&#8217;ll wait patiently.  I know this sucker can flash fry a buffalo in 40 seconds, but I want it now!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karl L. Gechlik</title>
		<link>http://www.asktheadmin.com/2007/11/should-i-try-the-new-firefox-3-beta-first-impressions.html/comment-page-1#comment-4493</link>
		<dc:creator>Karl L. Gechlik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 23:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ata.inspiritnetworks.com/2007/11/should-i-try-the-new-firefox-3-beta-first-impressions.html#comment-4493</guid>
		<description>@Jay I feel the same way but its very reminiscent of when I went from 1.5 to beta 2.0 oh so long ago...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jay I feel the same way but its very reminiscent of when I went from 1.5 to beta 2.0 oh so long ago&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://www.asktheadmin.com/2007/11/should-i-try-the-new-firefox-3-beta-first-impressions.html/comment-page-1#comment-4492</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 23:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ata.inspiritnetworks.com/2007/11/should-i-try-the-new-firefox-3-beta-first-impressions.html#comment-4492</guid>
		<description>My lappy is old (mobile amd, 1500+, 1.3GHz, 512mb ram) and struggles with a many tabs open, so i thought this would be a great test.  Wow what a difference!  3.0 is great.  Much faster, much less memory intensive.  My issue at the moment is that almost none of my plugins work w/ 3.0, so sadly this can&#039;t become my fulltime browser yet...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My lappy is old (mobile amd, 1500+, 1.3GHz, 512mb ram) and struggles with a many tabs open, so i thought this would be a great test.  Wow what a difference!  3.0 is great.  Much faster, much less memory intensive.  My issue at the moment is that almost none of my plugins work w/ 3.0, so sadly this can&#8217;t become my fulltime browser yet&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.asktheadmin.com/2007/11/should-i-try-the-new-firefox-3-beta-first-impressions.html/comment-page-1#comment-4489</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 20:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ata.inspiritnetworks.com/2007/11/should-i-try-the-new-firefox-3-beta-first-impressions.html#comment-4489</guid>
		<description>to the Opera fan - feel free to write in your selection!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>to the Opera fan &#8211; feel free to write in your selection!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karl L. Gechlik</title>
		<link>http://www.asktheadmin.com/2007/11/should-i-try-the-new-firefox-3-beta-first-impressions.html/comment-page-1#comment-4488</link>
		<dc:creator>Karl L. Gechlik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 20:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ata.inspiritnetworks.com/2007/11/should-i-try-the-new-firefox-3-beta-first-impressions.html#comment-4488</guid>
		<description>I thought I had problems with 25 open tabs! Damn Phil what are we doing real deal multi-tasking??&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;And @hmmm why would it be biased - our readers just know what they like! lmfao!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought I had problems with 25 open tabs! Damn Phil what are we doing real deal multi-tasking??</p>
<p>And @hmmm why would it be biased &#8211; our readers just know what they like! lmfao!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NinjaAdmin</title>
		<link>http://www.asktheadmin.com/2007/11/should-i-try-the-new-firefox-3-beta-first-impressions.html/comment-page-1#comment-4487</link>
		<dc:creator>NinjaAdmin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 20:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ata.inspiritnetworks.com/2007/11/should-i-try-the-new-firefox-3-beta-first-impressions.html#comment-4487</guid>
		<description>200 TABS? I did a double take - you must be thankful for memory in you rig!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>200 TABS? I did a double take &#8211; you must be thankful for memory in you rig!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hmm</title>
		<link>http://www.asktheadmin.com/2007/11/should-i-try-the-new-firefox-3-beta-first-impressions.html/comment-page-1#comment-4486</link>
		<dc:creator>hmm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 19:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ata.inspiritnetworks.com/2007/11/should-i-try-the-new-firefox-3-beta-first-impressions.html#comment-4486</guid>
		<description>opera.exe with ~200 tabs:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Memory: 435000 K&lt;br/&gt;VM: 463000 K&lt;br/&gt;CPU usage 0-5% from a 1.73Ghz Intel Celeron M.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;That above is Opera 9.5 beta which has some bugs to be fixed. We should compare again when both products are final.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;BTW that poll with &quot;the browser you use&quot; isn&#039;t biased at all...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>opera.exe with ~200 tabs:</p>
<p>Memory: 435000 K<br />VM: 463000 K<br />CPU usage 0-5% from a 1.73Ghz Intel Celeron M.</p>
<p>That above is Opera 9.5 beta which has some bugs to be fixed. We should compare again when both products are final.</p>
<p>BTW that poll with &#8220;the browser you use&#8221; isn&#8217;t biased at all&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Duntton III</title>
		<link>http://www.asktheadmin.com/2007/11/should-i-try-the-new-firefox-3-beta-first-impressions.html/comment-page-1#comment-4484</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Duntton III</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 15:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ata.inspiritnetworks.com/2007/11/should-i-try-the-new-firefox-3-beta-first-impressions.html#comment-4484</guid>
		<description>My 2.0 has been leaking memory worse then my car leaks antifreeze. U talked me into trying 3 out and there is no going back thanks dude for the push</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My 2.0 has been leaking memory worse then my car leaks antifreeze. U talked me into trying 3 out and there is no going back thanks dude for the push</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced)

Served from: www.asktheadmin.com @ 2012-02-10 01:27:03 -->
